Source: Chemoecology. Unidade: ESALQ
Subjects: COMPOSTOS VOLÁTEIS, DOMESTICAÇÃO DE PLANTAS, LAGARTAS, MILHO, PROTEÇÃO DE PLANTAS, TEOSINTO
A citação é gerada automaticamente e pode não estar totalmente de acordo com as normas
ABNT
NARANJO-GUEVARA, Natalia et al. A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes. Chemoecology, v. 31, p. 63–74, 2021Tradução . . Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00329-x. Acesso em: 21 maio 2024.APA
Naranjo-Guevara, N., Peñaflor, M. F. G. V., Silva, D. B., & Bento, J. M. S. (2021). A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes. Chemoecology, 31, 63–74. doi:10.1007/s00049-020-00329-xNLM
Naranjo-Guevara N, Peñaflor MFGV, Silva DB, Bento JMS. A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes [Internet]. Chemoecology. 2021 ; 31 63–74.[citado 2024 maio 21 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00329-xVancouver
Naranjo-Guevara N, Peñaflor MFGV, Silva DB, Bento JMS. A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes [Internet]. Chemoecology. 2021 ; 31 63–74.[citado 2024 maio 21 ] Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00329-x